Modern age is under capitalism and market economy, it focus contribution on distribution of wealth. It is distributed for need preferentially by social welfare but deficient. The gulf between rich and poor is getting worse, and the lower class and the labor lower class are getting increase. To solve like this problems it suggested to the nation that give basic income to all social member or all family. The thing is the national basic needs should supplied by the nation and give income to citizen to have a balanced distribution income. This distribution system ideology is similar which idea proposed by scholars of Silhak. The conception of Silhak was a trend of idea of social reform, it proposed modernistic course and politics. The idea of Silhak was emphasize the need by give all people some land equally for equitable income, by government-owned principles of the land, by upper-lower limit system of land-owning to narrow the gap between the wealthy and the poor.
Comparison between basic income institutional and Silhak of Choson will be propose realistic possibility and deduction of progress of basic income institutional. So this study is compare contribution with need in distribution of wealth standard by two idea's social and economic situation. According to this study, the purpose is to prepare for historical and philosophical base in introduce basic income.
As a result, Basic income and idea of Silhak is similar because distribution of wealth is not functioning at that time. These society and economic situation that need, contribution, ability or effort were not concern in distribution of wealth and the need were not satisfy national desire. For this reason to solve the imbalance situation, we need political discuss like introduce basic income.
This study aims to evaluate whether three factors distinguishing the welfare regimes (degree of job opportunities, degree of generousity, and degree of selectivism) affect the welfare attitude toward working people and non-working people. Especially, these two groups are selected because the change in policies for them is consistent with developing or restructuring of the welfare states. The result of multilevel analysis shows that the effect of welfare state institution on the welfare attitude is only significant on the policies of working people, not of non-working people
A descriptive and explanatory framework of studying the East Asian welfare models has dominated the literature in English since 'positive Orientalism was re-discovered and raised by western scholars. So far, this framework has already been attempted to generalize China's welfare system. By combining perspectives of culture and political economy, this framework claims that as the socialist state always prioritizes economic growth over welfare issues in the communist period and the market period, it is important to adopt a welfare-pluralist approach to analyze institutional arrangements. Moreover, the socialist state appears to preserve and utilize Confucian virtues and practices to justify its marginalized social policy. However, after introducing a theory of social quality which includes four integral components of socio-economic security, inclusion, cohesion and empowerment, this paper utilizes this theoretical framework to assess well-being in the period of danwei or work units. Ultimately, it argues that rather than Confucianism, it is more significant to discuss the coercive power of the state in welfare distribution as a path-dependent factor: that is, how state power has influenced recipients' well-being and what its ongoing impact is.
To face the population aging in Taiwan, there is not only more active treatments for elder people by medical technology improvement, aggressive continuation of rehabilitation therapy service after treatment are demanded. Through the provision of rehabilitation therapy service, more and more elderly people may not only achieve disease recovery and functional improvement, decrease the possibility of functional disability, but also increase the quality of life. However, what is the whole rehabilitation service delivery model and what is the predicament of this model in long term care system in Taiwan? This is the subject of concern in this study.
The method of this study was literature review to analysis and explore. Through the operation method of system review, collecting and organizing the literature by the key words: rehabilitation, long term care, service delivery, elderly, and so on, in order to realize that the status of rehabilitation service delivery model and ideal model may development in the future.
The result shows that the rehabilitation services that people received are still based on service model provided by medical institutions in majority, and still limited in the acute health care system. The long term care system in Taiwan has to promote the rehabilitation service delivery model. It must be considered and encouraged the development of community and home rehabilitation service delivery model effectively. In that way, the complete old life care service delivery system could be build completely, and provide elderly people various service programs and contents to choose to cater the diverse needs of elderly people in real life.
Gijang Welfare Network pilot project is conducted by Busan National University and Gijang County office from August in 2009 to July in 2010. They aim to promote the quality of elder's living especially who live in Gijang in Busan by stimulating the interaction and network between the community institutions in terms of welfare center, elderly residential factility and self-support center so on. In addition, they try to discover unknown senior clients who have a multiple problem by neglecting in blind spot zone. For continuing finacial support of local public body, and progress of network system, the correct prediction of outcomes is necessary.
The best known evaltuating method is SROI(Social Return On Investment) Evaluation. SROI is a social accounting way, that value the net economic Free Cash Flow and Social Results, then divide into Investment. In a word, SROI value and forecast economic and social outcomes simultaneously.
Our purpose of this paper is to predict the outcomes of Gijang welfare network pilot project, and produce the prediction of outcomes. This paper argues that Gijang welfare network pilot project contributes to senior clients by stimulating the cooperation and network in Gijang community